Case Law › High Court › Appellant v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-...

Appellant v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-39. Respondent

High Court 15 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

15 Sep 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appellant v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-39. Respondent, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: We accede to the prayer of the learned counsel and allow the appeal to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2002 M/s.ATV Projects India Ltd. Appellant vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax,Special Range-39.Respondent Ms.V.B. Patel for the appellant. Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.Vijay Kantharia i/b. Mr.PankajKapur for the respondent. P.C. CORAM: R. M. LODHA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 15th September 2004 2. We accede to the prayer of the learned counsel and allow the appeal to be withdrawn. 3. Refund of court fee as per law. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.