In Appellant v. Nasik Jillha Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd. Respondent, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.326 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Nashik.
Appellant
vs.
Nasik Jillha Sahakari DudhUtpadak Sangh Ltd.Respondent
Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Mr.V.H. Kanthariai/b. Mr.K.B. Rao for the appellant.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 15th October 2004
P.C.
Heard the learned senior counsel for the revenue.
2. The consideration of the matter by the Tribunal doesnot suffer from any legal infirmity.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue