Appellant v. Shri Bolar Anand Suvarna, Mumbai
High Court
12 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Appellant v. Shri Bolar Anand Suvarna, Mumbai
Date of order
12 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appellant v. Shri Bolar Anand Suvarna, Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.Appeal is dismissed accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.173 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Mumbai City-XVI, Mumbai.
Appellant
vs.
Shri Bolar Anand Suvarna, Mumbai
Respondent
Ms. S. V. Bharucha i/b. Mr. H. D. Rathod for the appellant.
Mr. Jitendra Jain i/b. Mr. R. D. Suvarna for the respondent.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA &J. P. DEVADHAR,JJ.
P.C.:
Date :12[h] August 2004
Heard.
2.It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the revenue thatthe controversy raised in the appeal is concluded by the Division Benchjudgment of this Court in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. Pvt. Ltd. v.Commissioner of Income-tax, 249 ITR 265.
3.
No substantial question of law arises.
4.Appeal is dismissed accordingly.
(R. M. LODHA, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue