Case Law › High Court › Appellant v. The Asst. Commissioner Of I...

Appellant v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 10, Mumbai & Anr. Respondents

High Court 28 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Oct 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Appellant v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 10, Mumbai & Anr. Respondents, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.631 OF 2003 M/s.Lead Consultants Pvt.Ltd. Appellant vs. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 10, Mumbai & anr.Respondents Ms.Asifa Khan i/b. Mr.K.Gopal for the appellant. Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mr.V.H.Kantharia for therespondents. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 28th October 2004 P.C. Ms.Asifa Khan, the learned counsel for appellant submits that she has instructions to withdraw the appeal. 2. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. 3. Refund of court fee as per law. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) the

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.