Appellants By This Court In Cit v. Tata Elxsi Ltd

- ITA No.381/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 2 DAY QF AUGUST 2Q1/PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.381/2017 BETWEEN : 1.THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CIT(A)|5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING| 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCIRCLE-11(2), PRESENT ADDRESSCIRCLE-11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS CIRCLE-2(1)(1),2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095APPELLANTS (BY SRI ARAVIND K.V, ADVOCATE)| AND = M/S CISCO SYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.NO.11, DIVYASHREE CHAMBERS|‘B’ WING, ‘O SHAUGNESSEY ROADOFF LANGFORD ROADBENGALURU —- 560 Q27 . RESPONDENT| THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOMETAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL|AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT ‘A’ BENCH,|BENGALURU IN IT (TP) A NO.192/BANG/2014 DATED 19.08.2016.CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE DRP AND CONFIRM THE| - ITA No.381/2017 ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME|TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BENGALURU. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,H.G.,.RAMESH , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)" Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answered against the| appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. | 1(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)|]. Tne appeal is accordinglyGcismissecd Appeal dismissed, Sd/-|JUDGE| HR Sd/-'JUDGE|