Case LawHigh Court › Appellant(S v. A.p.sridhar (Huf)Newry Sh...

Appellant(S v. A.p.sridhar (Huf)Newry Shobika, Flat

High Court 28 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. A.p.sridhar (Huf)Newry Shobika, Flat
Date of order
28 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appellant(S v. A.p.sridhar (Huf)Newry Shobika, Flat, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA No. 307 of 2022 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-IChennai. Appellant(s) Vs A.P.Sridhar (HUF)Newry Shobika, Flat No.2, 1st Floor, New No.3, Chimmaiah Pillai Street, T. Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras A Bench, Chennai dated 23.02.2022 passed in I.T.A.No. 2735/Chny/2016. ______________Page 1 of 4 For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Ravi Kumar Mr.S.Sridhar JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue and learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024, dated 15.03.2024, and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the question of law may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter. ______________ Page 2 of 4 3. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 28.08.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nosasi To: 1. The Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunals Chennai. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Business Circle-II, Chennai. Business Circle-II, Chennai. 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2 Chennai. Chennai. ______________ Page 3 of 4 ______________ Page 4 of 4 TCA.No.307 of 2022 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SUNDER MOHAN,J. (sasi) TCA No. 307 of 2022 28.08.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan