Case Law › High Court › Appellant(S v. D Rukminiand Another

Appellant(S v. D Rukminiand Another

High Court 22 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

22 Jul 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appellant(S v. D Rukminiand Another, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANCMP No.14893 of 2025in CMA SR No.42213 of 2025 Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxThe Initiating Officer (Benami Prohibition Unit) Room No.02, Ground Floor, Income Tax Investigation Wing Building, 108, M.G. Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034 Appellant(s) Vs D Rukminiand another Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s.M.Sheela ORDER (Order of the Court was madeby the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This application is filed to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the impugned order dated 13.08.2024 passed by the Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA at New Delhi, Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988 in FPA PBD 915/CHN/2019. Considering the submissions that as against the common order, appeals are already filed and the certified copy has been placed on record in CMA No.1448 of 2025, we are inclined to grant exemption as prayed. List the appeal along with CMA No.1448 of 2025. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 22.07.2025 TAR

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.