Appellant(S v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-1(1), Chennai 34
High Court
29 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-1(1), Chennai 34
Date of order
29 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Appellant(S v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle-1(1), Chennai 34, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-01-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
TCA NO. 552 of 2023
Avalon Technologies Limited
TPI Block, B-7 and B-8, 1st Main Road, MEPZ-SEZ, Tambaram, Chennai 45.
Appellant(s)
Vs
Deputy Commissioner Of Income TaxCorporate Circle-1(1), Chennai 34.
For Appellant(s):
Mr.M.R.Guruprasad For M/s.Pass Associates For The Appellant.
Respondent(s)
For Respondent(s):
Mr.T.Ravi Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel For Sole Respondent - Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai 34.
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Anita Sumanth J.)
Mr.M.R.Guruprasad, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has
availed Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and Form -2 for quantification of arrears dated
31.12.2024 has also been issued, a copy of which is placed on file. Hence, he makes an
endorsement to the effect that the appellant wishes to withdraw this appeal.
Dr.ANITA SUMANT,J.
AND
G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.
2. Recording the aforesaid, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs.
sl
(ANITA SUMANTH J.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN J.)
29-01-2025
To
1. Deputy Commissioner Of Income TaxCorporate Circle-1(1), Chennai 34.
TCA NO. 552 of 2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.