Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Appellant(S v. Gemini Communication Limi...

Appellant(S v. Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018

High Court 09 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018
Date of order
09 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appellant(S v. Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

T.C.A.No.723 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN TCA No. 723 of 2016 Commissioner of Income-tax 2No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai. Appellant(s) Vs Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras β€œC” Bench, dated 18.3.2016 in ITA.No.1933/Mds/2015. For Appellant(s):Mr.T.Ravi Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent(s):M/s.Surabi Puhazhendi ______________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue and learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024, and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the questions of law may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.09.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nosasi ______________ Page 2 of 4 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Company Circle-II(2), Chennai – 34. Company Circle-II(2), Chennai – 34. 2. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) 6 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam Chennai – 600 034. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam Chennai – 600 034. 3. The Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai. Chennai. ______________ Page 3 of 4 ______________ Page 4 of 4 T.C.A.No.723 of 2016 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (sasi) TCA No. 723 of 2016 09.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan