Appellant(S v. Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018
High Court
09 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018
Date of order
09 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Dismissed
The order β as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appellant(S v. Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
T.C.A.No.723 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.09.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
TCA No. 723 of 2016
Commissioner of Income-tax 2No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.
Appellant(s)
Vs
Gemini Communication Limited1, Dr. Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018.
Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras βCβ Bench, dated 18.3.2016 in ITA.No.1933/Mds/2015.
For Appellant(s):Mr.T.Ravi Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent(s):M/s.Surabi Puhazhendi
______________
Page 1 of 4
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue and learned
counsel for the respondent/assessee.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits
that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024, and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the questions of law may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter.
In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.09.2025
Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nosasi
______________
Page 2 of 4
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Company Circle-II(2), Chennai β 34. Company Circle-II(2), Chennai β 34.
2. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) 6 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam Chennai β 600 034. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam Chennai β 600 034.
3. The Registrar
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai. Chennai.
______________
Page 3 of 4
______________
Page 4 of 4
T.C.A.No.723 of 2016
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J.
(sasi)
TCA No. 723 of 2016
09.09.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.