Appellant(S v. M/S Computer Graphics Ltd,Sterling Silver Nos.24 And
High Court
24 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. M/S Computer Graphics Ltd,Sterling Silver Nos.24 And
Date of order
24 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appellant(S v. M/S Computer Graphics Ltd,Sterling Silver Nos.24 And, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24-09-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
TCA No. 258 of 2013AND
TCA NO. 259 OF 2013,TCA NO. 260 OF 2013,TCA NO. 261 OF 2013
1. Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle II, 108, Mg Road Chennai 600 034
Appellant(s)
Vs
1. M/s Computer Graphics Ltd,Sterling Silver Nos.24 And 25, Sivaganga Road Off Sterling Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034PAN: AAA CC 1274 F
Respondent(s)
TCA No. 259 of 2013
1. Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle II 108 Mg Road
TCA No. 258 of 2013Chennai 600 034 Appellant(s)Vs1. M/s Computer Graphics LtdSterling Silver Nos.24 And 25 Sivaganga Road Off Sterling Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034Respondent(s)TCA No. 260 of 20131. Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle Ii 108 Mg Road Chennai 600 034Appellant(s)Vs1. M/s Computer Graphics LtdSterling Silver Nos.24 And 25 Sivaganga Road Off Sterling Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034Respondent(s)TCA No. 261 of 20131. Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle Ii 108 Mg Road Chennai 600 034Appellant(s)Vs1. M/s Computer Graphics LtdSterling Silver Nos.24 And 25
Sivaganga Road Off Sterling Road
Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034
TCA No. 258 of 2013
Respondent(s)
PRAYER
Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, A Bench, dated 08.05.2012 in ITA No.441/mds/2012.
TCA No. 259 of 2013
PRAYER
Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, A Bench, dated 08.05.2012 in ITA No.442/mds/2012.
TCA No. 260 of 2013
PRAYER
Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, A Bench, dated 08.05.2012 in ITA No.443/mds/2012.
TCA No. 261 of 2013
PRAYER
Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, A Bench, dated 08.05.2012 in ITA No.444/mds/2012.
In all Applications
For Appellant(s):Mr.Karthick Ranganathan
Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax
For Respondent(s):Mr.Mahesh Raichandani
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Mr.V.Mahalingam, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant/Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal qua assessment period 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-02 and 2008-09 and seek withdrawal of the same on account of the low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs.
(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J.)
24-09-2025
gdIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No
1.M/s Computer Graphics LtdSterling Silver Nos.24 And 25 Sivaganga Road Off Sterling Road Nungambakkam Chennai - 34
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J.
gd
TCA No. 258 of 2013AND TCA NO. 259 OF 2013,TCA NO. 260 OF 2013,TCA NO. 261 OF 2013
24-09-2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.