Case LawHigh Court › Appellant(S v. Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprak...

Appellant(S v. Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004, Tamil Nadu, India

High Court 26 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004, Tamil Nadu, India
Date of order
26 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Appellant(S v. Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004, Tamil Nadu, India, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

CMP NO. 4108 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN CMP NO. 4108 of 2025 AND WA SR NO. 9952 OF 2025 Deputy Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Wing, Central Circle 2(1), Investigation Wing, Room No. B3, Ground Floor, New No. 46, MG Road, Chennai and another Appellant(s) Vs Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004, Tamil Nadu, India. WA SR NO. 9952 of 2025 Respondent(s) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 2(1)Central Wing, Central Circle 2(1), Investigation Wing, Room No. B3, Ground Floor, New No. 46, MG Road, Chennai and another Appellant(s) Vs Rajan Narasimulu JayaprakashCentral Wing, Central Circle 2(1), Investigation Wing, Room No. B3, Ground Floor, New No. 46, MG Road, Chennai Respondent(s) CMP NO. 4108 of 2025 For Appellant(s):M/S. A.P.Srinivas A.N.R. JayaprathapFor Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajagopalan for Mr.M.V.SwaroopCHENNAI WA SR NO. 9952 of 2025 For Appellant(s):A.N.R.JayaprathapFor Respondent(s): ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.) 1. This petition is filed to condone the delay of 195 days in representing the above appeal. 2. Mr.R.Rajagopalan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing this petition. 3. This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. 4. Since the delay has been properly explained to the satisfaction of this Court, this petition is ordered. (S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.) 26-02-2025 CMP NO. 4108 of 2025 To 1. Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash96, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004, Tamil Nadu, India. WA SR NO. 9952 of 2025 1. Rajan Narasimulu Jayaprakash Central Wing, Central Circle 2(1), Investigation Wing, Room No. B3, Ground Floor, New No. 46, MG Road, Chennai
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan