Appellant(S v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Range Ii, Chennai, Presently Corporate Circle 2(1), Chennai - 600 034
High Court
09 Oct 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Range Ii, Chennai, Presently Corporate Circle 2(1), Chennai - 600 034
Date of order
09 Oct 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Appellant(S v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Taxcompany Range Ii, Chennai, Presently Corporate Circle 2(1), Chennai - 600 034, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated in the affidavit, we are inclined to allow the prayer and grant exemption from filing the certified copy of the order in ITA No.2334/Chny/2017 dated 30.08.2022.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.10.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
CMP NO. 24058 of 2025in TCA SR No.145139 of 2025
Empee Distilleries LimitedEmpee Tower, No.59 Harris Road, Pudupet, Chennai- 600 002, and presently having registered office at No. 72, Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006
Appellant(s)
Vs
The Additional Commissioner of Income TaxCompany Range II, Chennai, Presently Corporate Circle 2(1), Chennai - 600 034.
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s):
Karthik Lakshmanan AR
ORDER
(Order of the Court was madeby the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, we are inclined to
allow the prayer and grant exemption from filing the certified copy of the order in ITA No.2334/Chny/2017 dated 30.08.2022.
3. Application is, accordingly, allowed.
4. List the appeal for admission.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 09.10.2025
TAR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue