Case LawHigh Court › Appellant(S v. The Assistant Commissione...

Appellant(S v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon Corporate Circle-8, Chennai

High Court 20 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon Corporate Circle-8, Chennai
Date of order
20 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Appellant(S v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon Corporate Circle-8, Chennai, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CMP No. 6380 of 2025ANDTCA SR NO. 94291 OF 2023 1. M/s. Balaji Autos301, M.T.H.Road, Kamarajapuram, Ambattur, Chennai-600053 Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income TaxNon Corporate Circle-8, Chennai Respondent(s) TCA SR No. 94291 of 20231. M/s. Balaji Autos Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 6380 of 2025 PRAYER To condone the delay of 236 days in filing the above Tax Case Appeal PRAYER TCA SR No. 94291 of 2023 Tax Case Appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, Bench 'A' dated 29.07.2022 in I.T.A.No.535/Chny/2022. CMP No. 6380 of 2025 For Appellant(s): Mr.Logesh G. for Mr.R.Sivaraman For Respondent(s): Ms.V.Pushpa Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.S.Sundar J.) This petition is filed to condone the delay of 236 days in filing the above Tax Case Appeal. 2.The petitioner, in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, has given https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis sufficient reasons explaining the delay. Ms.V.Pushpa, learned Senior Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the respondent, has no serious objection for condoning the delay. Since the delay has been properly explained to the satisfaction of this Court, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered. (S.S.SUNDAR J.)(R.HEMALATHA J.)20-03-2025 Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No CMP No. 6380 of 2025 S.S.SUNDAR J.ANDR.HEMALATHA J. CMP No. 6380 of 2025AND TCA SR NO. 94291 OF 2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan