Case LawHigh Court › Appellant(S v. The Principal Commissione...

Appellant(S v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcr Hall

High Court 02 Apr 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant(S v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcr Hall
Date of order
02 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Appellant(S v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxcr Hall, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN CMP No. 7505 of 2025ANDTCA SR NO. 44194 OF 2025 1. Thenmozhi GanesanW/o. P. Ganesan, 13A, Collectorate, Indira Nagar, Dindigul 624 004. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income TaxCR Hall, 2, VP, V. Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai 625002 Respondent(s)TCA SR No. 44194 of 20251. Thenmozhi Ganesan13A, Collectorate, Indira Nagar, Dindigul 624 004Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai13A, Collectorate, Indira Nagar, Dindigul 624 004 CMP No. 7505 of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER To condone the delay of 42 days in preferring the present appeal and thus render justice. TCA SR No. 44194 of 2025 PRAYER To set aside the Order dated 30.09.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, in ITA No. 1628/CHNY/2024 and consequently allow the appeal of the Appellant and thus render justice. CMP No. 7505 of 2025 For Appellant(s):M/s.S.Sowjanya For Respondent(s):Dr.B.Ramasamy,Senior Standing Counsel ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.S.Sundar J.) This petition is filed to condone the delay of 42 days in preferring the above Appeal. 2.This Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Dr.B.Ramasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the respondent, has no serious objection for ordering this petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant submits that the petitioner/assessee has availed the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition deserves to be ordered. Accordingly, this petition is ordered. 3.Registry is directed to number the above Appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order, and list the same for admission on 07.04.2025. (S.S.SUNDAR J.)(C.SARAVANAN J.) 02-04-2025 Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No mkn To 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax CR Hall, 2, VP, V. Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai 625002 CMP No. 7505 of 2025 S.S.SUNDAR J.ANDC.SARAVANAN J. mkn CMP No. 7505 of 2025AND TCA SR NO. 44194 OF 2025 02-04-2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan