Applicant. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Non-Applicant M/S. Indian Poultry Rajnandgaon, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (Cg
High Court
16 Dec 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Applicant. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Non-Applicant M/S. Indian Poultry Rajnandgaon, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (Cg
Date of order
16 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Applicant. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Non-Applicant M/S. Indian Poultry Rajnandgaon, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (Cg, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Raju
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Coram:Hon' ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, &Hon' ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJHOL ^ JaollM.C.C. (Pm No.2864 of 2010
Applicant.Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur.
Vs.Non-applicantM/s. Indian Poultry Rajnandgaon, Tahsil& District Rajnandgaon (CG).
(Application for restoration of ITA No. 76 of 2003)
Present:
Shri Sameer Shrivastava, counsel for the applicant.
ORAL ORDER
(Passedon[16-12-2010)]
Per Dhirendra Mishra, J
1.The matter is listed on default.However, learned counsel appearing forthe applicant submits that he wants to withdraw this application.
2.Accordingly, M.C.C. (PR) No. 2864 of 2010 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-Sd/-Dhirendra MishraR.N. ChandrakarJudgeJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue