Applicantcommissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Frespondentsm/S Dayalmaghji Andco.malviyaroad,Raipur
High Court
08 May 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Applicantcommissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Frespondentsm/S Dayalmaghji Andco.malviyaroad,Raipur
Date of order
08 May 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Applicantcommissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Frespondentsm/S Dayalmaghji Andco.malviyaroad,Raipur, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
W
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHrB'l-bA—SPUR
D.B.:HON’BLE MR. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA &HON’BLE MR. RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, JJ.
M.C.C. NO. 209/2013
APPLICANTCommissioner of income Tax, Raipur.
Versus
fRESPONDENTSM/s DayalMaghji andCo.MalviyaRoad,Raipur.
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION
Appearance:
Mr. Anand Dadariya, Advocate for the Applicant.
ORDER(08/05/2013)
Heard.
Mr. Anand Dadariya, learned counsel for the Applicant, makes statement thatinadvertently instead of filing a review petition, the applicant has tiled MCC makingprayer[for][ restoration][ of][ the][ original][ income][ Text][ Appeal](ITA),[therefore,][ this][ MCC]may bepermittedto be withdrawn as theapplicant wouldfile aduly constitutedreview petition.
M.C.C. No. 209/2013 for restoration, therefore, is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/-\lRangnath[Chandrakar]Sd/lJudgeSunil[Kumar][ Sinha]aJudgel
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.