Case Law › High Court › Applicantcommissioner Of Income Tax, Rai...

Applicantcommissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Ku. Divya Puri

High Court 10 May 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

10 May 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Applicantcommissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur v. Ku. Divya Puri, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUbICATURE AT &ILASPUR,<V\\M.C.C. N0._[o97yid^^Y0$/^^jvJsionBendlt>^'APPL1CAN:.,»:iiln^fnmisioner[of]Income Tax.f^-rtr' <",.^v'Raipur,V.^^^^••-01 saC.-Ky^Divya ,D/0 Vi'jay Kumar PuriNON-APPLICANT'I.R.S. Commisioner ofCentralExcise (Appeal) Central ExciseBulding Dhamtari Road, Tikrapara.Rai'purAPPi.ICATOINFORRESTORATXONOFITANo.754/Z007t}ISMJSSEt>ASBARREDBVLIMITATEOVI&EORE>EROATED^•p^-r,6.20Q9PASSEDBYTHEHON'BLEbIVISIONBENCH(HON'BLEMR.OHIRENbRAMISHR/tdHON'BLEMR.JUSTICER.N.CHAN&RAKAR) ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR D.B.:HON'BLEMR.SUNILKUMARSINHA&HON'BLE MR. RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, JJ. M.C.C. N0. 1097/2012 APPLICANTCommissioner of Income Tax, Raipur. Versus •~*\ Ku. Divya Puri. RESPONDENTS APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION Appearance: Mr. Anand Dadariya, Advocate for the Applicant. ORDER(10/05/2013) Heard. Mr. Anand Dadariya, learned counsel for the Applicant, makes statement thatinadvertently instead offiling a review petition, the applicant has filed MCCmakingprayer for restoration of the original Income Text Appeal (ITA), therefore, this MCCmay be permitted to be withdrawn as the applicant would file a-duly constitutedreview petition. M.C.C. No. 1097/2012 for restoration, therefore, is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- Sunil Kumar SinhaJudge Sd/- R.N.ChandrakarJudee

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.