Applicantmaniklal Bhattacharya v. Income

i 1i! l»i >/i ^.^ Itl l •lll|rBJJB8)^l.SsA»=a° •^^^./-ij'^'-.'^'-i.'u'^-o,r/.»i'^.CV.rf\-'^n-'-LL~i.Tj^^.r:yui-'i^'1--'T-'Vt»'^'- IN Tj-1 E_HIG 1-LCOIJ RT QF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR 5S3 MCC No. of 2012 Maniklal BhattacharyaH.No 19/20 4th FloorDhebarTower,Bazar Raipur (C.G.) APPLICANT:^l^:w^··"^^T stiS'8''^"-^'^^^:Versus Byron RESPONDENT: IncomeTaxOfficer,Circle-2(4),Raipur,(CG) APPLICATION FOR RESTO_RATION QFTAXCASE N0.2/2012 DISnfllSSEDON 9thN\PRI L,2012 FOR DEFAULT ^ ^ 'Ainit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. 533 of2012 APPLICANTManiklal Bhattacharya. VERSUS Income OfiBcer, Circle-2 RESPONDENT Tax (4) Raipur. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF TAX CASE N0. 2/2012 DISMISSEDON 9 APRIL.2012 FOR DEFAULT.Coram:Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri &Hon'ble Shri Rangnath Chandrakar, JJ. Ms. Smiti Sharma, Advocate for the applicatit Present: ORDER (Passed on 02n(l day ofJuly, 2012) I.A. No. 1, this is an application for condonation of delay in film^application for restoration. Though, sufBcient cause has not beenshown, however, onthe facts ofthe case, delay is con<^ned.; 1, ^2.A' .;Leamed counsel appearing for fhe applicant submits that Tax Case No.02 of 2012 was dismissed for want of prosecution- on account of non-complianee of the pre-emptory order passed by this Bench, on09.04.2012. Ms. Shanna further submits that the mistake was bona fide,therefore, Tax Case No. 02 of2012, may be restored to its file.Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. The order dated09.04.2012 is recalled and fiirther two days time is granted to removefhe default, as pointed outby the office. In fhe evsnt, default is removed,Ihe case be restored to the oneinal file. Ifthe default continues after theextended period oftwo days, the appeal shall stand dismissed for wantofprosecution. 3.*-„<. A copy oftbis order be placed on record of Tax Case No. 02 of 2012,aud the same be listed for hearing. 4. Sd./-R.N. ChandrakarJudge Sd/-S.K. AgnihotriJudge