Applicants Nemichand Nahar & Another v. Non-Applicants Conmiissioher Oflncome Tax & Others
High Court
02 Feb 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Applicants Nemichand Nahar & Another v. Non-Applicants Conmiissioher Oflncome Tax & Others
Date of order
02 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Applicants Nemichand Nahar & Another v. Non-Applicants Conmiissioher Oflncome Tax & Others, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
\
BEFORETHE HIGM COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G_J
M.C.C. No.3.1 /^^v.^»,'NemichandAPPUCANLS Nahar, aged about 64/t:hunnilalS/oNahar,years,'N.C.ProprietorsM"/sNahar,Malviya Nagar,^6urg |C.G.)/^.<i^i^'^''/y ^'/^/2./§mt. SwaroopBaiNahar,agedabout 62 years, W/o TSemichandNahar, Through : Attorney Shri N.C.y/'^y'"/^y'/"^^Nahar,S/oChunnilalNahar,^ rMalviya Nagar, Durg (C.G.)...'....,^u^-fv^%7 ^o^']^^-^^^^w[}/''^wr{y4<>yE<^VERSUSNON-APPLiCAWSCommissionerofIncomeTax,
CommissionerofIncomeTax,Prosecution,ChhattisgarhRaipur(C.G.)Prosecution,ChhattisgarhRaipur(C.G.)
'Additional Director of Income Tux. of Income Tux. Income Tux. Tux. Director of Income Tux. of Income Tux. Income Tux. Tux.Investigation - 1, Raipur (C.G.) - 1, Raipur (C.G.) 1, Raipur (C.G.) Raipur (C.G.) (C.G.)
'Additional2. Director of Income Tux. of Income Tux. Income Tux. Tux.Investigation - 1, Raipur (C.G.) - 1, Raipur (C.G.) 1, Raipur (C.G.) Raipur (C.G.) (C.G.)3.Deputy Commissioner of IncomeT.ax, Circle - Bhilai, District - Durg..^.,r'"income4.TaxOfficer,WardChandrapur (Maharashtra)
APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION OFWRIT PETITION No.'942/2001
HIGH COLTRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
.C.C.No. 21 of2011
APPLICANTSNemichand Nahar & Another.VERSUSNON-APPLICANTSConmiissioher oflncome Tax & Others.
NON-APPLICANTS
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETmON N0. 942/2001
SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Aginhotn.J.
Present:Shri S.C.Verma, Advocate for the applicaats.
ORDER(ORAL)(Passed on 02°''day of Febmaty, 2011)
1.Leamed counsel appearing for the applicant subniits tliat tiiecounsel for the applicant could not appear on account of bonafidemistake, tlierefore,WritPetition No.942/2001,wliich wasdismissed on 30.11.2010 mav be restored to its file.2.Reasonable and sufBcient cause has been shown. Writ Petition No.942/2001, is restored to the original file.
3.A copy of fhis order be placed on record of the origmal wi-itpetition[and][ the][ same][ be][ listed][ for][ hearing.]petition[and][ the][ same][ be][ listed][ for][ hearing.]
Sd/-SatisbK. AgnihotnJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.