Case LawHigh Court › Applicants Nemichand Nahar & Another v....

Applicants Nemichand Nahar & Another v. Non-Applicants Conmiissioher Oflncome Tax & Others

High Court 02 Feb 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Applicants Nemichand Nahar & Another v. Non-Applicants Conmiissioher Oflncome Tax & Others
Date of order
02 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Applicants Nemichand Nahar & Another v. Non-Applicants Conmiissioher Oflncome Tax & Others, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

\ BEFORETHE HIGM COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G_J M.C.C. No.3.1 /^^v.^»,'NemichandAPPUCANLS Nahar, aged about 64/t:hunnilalS/oNahar,years,'N.C.ProprietorsM"/sNahar,Malviya Nagar,^6urg |C.G.)/^.<i^i^'^''/y ^'/^/2./§mt. SwaroopBaiNahar,agedabout 62 years, W/o TSemichandNahar, Through : Attorney Shri N.C.y/'^y'"/^y'/"^^Nahar,S/oChunnilalNahar,^ rMalviya Nagar, Durg (C.G.)...'....,^u^-fv^%7 ^o^']^^-^^^^w[}/''^wr{y4<>yE<^VERSUSNON-APPLiCAWSCommissionerofIncomeTax, CommissionerofIncomeTax,Prosecution,ChhattisgarhRaipur(C.G.)Prosecution,ChhattisgarhRaipur(C.G.) 'Additional Director of Income Tux. of Income Tux. Income Tux. Tux. Director of Income Tux. of Income Tux. Income Tux. Tux.Investigation - 1, Raipur (C.G.) - 1, Raipur (C.G.) 1, Raipur (C.G.) Raipur (C.G.) (C.G.) 'Additional2. Director of Income Tux. of Income Tux. Income Tux. Tux.Investigation - 1, Raipur (C.G.) - 1, Raipur (C.G.) 1, Raipur (C.G.) Raipur (C.G.) (C.G.)3.Deputy Commissioner of IncomeT.ax, Circle - Bhilai, District - Durg..^.,r'"income4.TaxOfficer,WardChandrapur (Maharashtra) APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION OFWRIT PETITION No.'942/2001 HIGH COLTRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .C.C.No. 21 of2011 APPLICANTSNemichand Nahar & Another.VERSUSNON-APPLICANTSConmiissioher oflncome Tax & Others. NON-APPLICANTS APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETmON N0. 942/2001 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Aginhotn.J. Present:Shri S.C.Verma, Advocate for the applicaats. ORDER(ORAL)(Passed on 02°''day of Febmaty, 2011) 1.Leamed counsel appearing for the applicant subniits tliat tiiecounsel for the applicant could not appear on account of bonafidemistake, tlierefore,WritPetition No.942/2001,wliich wasdismissed on 30.11.2010 mav be restored to its file.2.Reasonable and sufBcient cause has been shown. Writ Petition No.942/2001, is restored to the original file. 3.A copy of fhis order be placed on record of the origmal wi-itpetition[and][ the][ same][ be][ listed][ for][ hearing.]petition[and][ the][ same][ be][ listed][ for][ hearing.] Sd/-SatisbK. AgnihotnJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan