Case LawHigh Court › Applicant(S v. M/S Jindal Power Limited...

Applicant(S v. M/S Jindal Power Limited Kharsia Road, Raigarh (C.g

High Court 26 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Applicant(S v. M/S Jindal Power Limited Kharsia Road, Raigarh (C.g
Date of order
26 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Applicant(S v. M/S Jindal Power Limited Kharsia Road, Raigarh (C.g, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(MCC No. 588 of 2025) Digitallysigned byADITIADITIDIWANDIWANKAIWARTKAIWARTDate:2025.06.3015:50:44+0530 2025:CGHC:28573-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURMCC No. 588 of 2025 1 - The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Range -1 Bilaspur(C.G.) --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - M/s Jindal Power Limited Kharsia Road, Raigarh (C.G.) --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :- Mr. Ajay Kumrani, AdvocateFor Non-applicant :- None. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal andHon'ble Shri JusticeSanjay Kumar Jaiswal Sanjay K. Agrawal, J Order on Board(27.06.2025) 1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application seekingcondonation of delay in filing the application for restorationof TAXC No.8/2025.condonation of delay in filing the application for restorationof TAXC No.8/2025. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is @d!t! (MCC No. 588 of 2025) allowedand the delay of 38 days caused in filing theinstant MCC is hereby condoned. 3. Also, heard finally. 4. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of TAXCNo.8/2025, which was dismissed for non-compliance ofthis Court’s peremptory order dated 28.02.2025.No.8/2025, which was dismissed for non-compliance ofthis Court’s peremptory order dated 28.02.2025. 5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same isallowed. TAXC No.8/2025 is restored to its original numberfor its hearing and disposal in accordance with law.allowed. TAXC No.8/2025 is restored to its original numberfor its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan