Case LawHigh Court › Applicant(S v. South Eastern Coalfields...

Applicant(S v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspurchhattisgarh

High Court 07 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Applicant(S v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspurchhattisgarh
Date of order
07 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Applicant(S v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspurchhattisgarh, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byADITIADITIDIWANDIWANKAIWARTKAIWARTDate:2025.05.0912:31:28+0530 2025:CGHC:21294-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURMCC No. 457 of 2025 1 - Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 (1) MahimaCommercial Complex, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, BilaspurChhattisgarh --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant:- Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate For Non-applicant :- Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S. Rajeshwara Rao, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal andHon'ble Shri JusticeSanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board(08.05.2025) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J 1. Heard on IA No.1, which is an application seekingcondonation of delay in filing the application for restorationof TAXC No.58/2022.condonation of delay in filing the application for restorationof TAXC No.58/2022. 2. In the considered opinion of this Court, sufficient cause (MCC No. 457 of 2025) has been shown by the applicant for the delay of 28 dayscaused in filing of this MCC and for not filing the paper-book within the stipulated time. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 isallowedand the delay is hereby condoned. 3. Also, heard on admission. 4. Admit. 5. Issue notice to the non-applicant. 6. Learned counsel for the non-applicant accepts notice onbehalf of the non-applicant.behalf of the non-applicant. 7. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 8. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of TAXCNo.58/2022, which was dismissed for non-compliance ofthis Court’s peremptory order dated 07.02.2025.No.58/2022, which was dismissed for non-compliance ofthis Court’s peremptory order dated 07.02.2025. 9. For the reasons stated in the application, the same isallowed. TAXC No.58/2022 is restored to its originalnumber for its hearing and disposal in accordance withlaw.allowed. TAXC No.58/2022 is restored to its originalnumber for its hearing and disposal in accordance withlaw. 10.Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge @d!t!
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan