Appp v. Dy. Com Of Income Tax And Anr

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.139 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.614 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.614 OF 2011WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.615 OF 2011WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.616 OF 2011 Pinakin Kantilal Patel .Applicant V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax.Respondents& anr. Mr.Prakash Naik, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate, for Respondent No.1Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent No.2 - State CORAM:REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.DATE:27TH JUNE, 2014 .Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. seeks permission to travel abroad. states that the applicant is an Architect by profession and is required to travel abroad in connection with his work. He submits that on earlier occasions, this Court had granted the applicant permission to travel abroad. He submits that the applicant has not misused the liberty which was granted to him. The said statement is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1. 4.Considering that the application filed by the applicant has been admitted by this Court and the fact that vide earlier orders passed by this Court, the applicant has been permitted to travel abroad, the present application deserves to be allowed. The applicant is permitted to travel abroad upto May, 2015. 5.The Criminal Application No.139 of 2014 is allowed on the aforesaid terms and is disposed of accordingly. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)