Case Law › High Court › Appp v. Dy. Commof Income Tax And Anr

Appp v. Dy. Commof Income Tax And Anr

High Court 20 Nov 2012 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

20 Nov 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Appp v. Dy. Commof Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Pvr FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.289 OF 2012 INCRIMINAL APPLICATION(APL) NO.614 OF 2011WITHCRIMINAL APPLICATION(APL) NO.614 OF 2011 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's Orderappearances, Court's ordersor directions and Registrar's orders. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr.Ganesh Bhujbal i/b. Mr.Prakash Naik, for Applicant. Mr.D.R.More, APP for State. --- CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 20[th] November, 2012. ------ P.C.:- The respondents are served, however absent. The applicant as an Architect has made an application to permit to travel abroad. The earlier orders of such permission are not misused. Consequently, the application is allowed to travel abroad Pvr upto January 31, 2013. He shall report the authorities after his return. The application is allowed to the extent as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.