Appp v. Dy.comm Of Income Tax And Anr

906-appp-358-2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2015 Pinakin Kantilal Patel ..Applicant(Org. Accused No. 7) V/s. Dy. Comm of Income TaxSpecial Range-20, Mumbai & Anr... Respondents ---- Mr. Prakash Naik for the applicant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent no. 1. Mr. Rajesh More, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent no. 2. ---- CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.DATE : 24TH APRIL 2015. P.C. 1.Heard learned counsel Mr. Prakash Naik for the applicant, the learned counsel Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent no. 1 and the learned A.P.P. Mr. Rajesh More for the State. 2.The applicant is facing trial for the offence punishable under the Income tax Act before the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate's 47[th] Court at Esplanade, Mumbai. He has filed an application under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing of the proceedings. The stay application is pending vide Criminal Application (APL) no. 614/2011. There is stay of proceedings before the trial Court. nsk page 1 of 2 906-appp-358-2015 3.The applicant is working in an architect firm and he is required to travel abroad for various purposes during the period between 12[th] May 2015 to 16[th] February, 2016. 4.The applicant is a permanent resident of Mumbai and he has permanent business in Mumbai. In view thereof, I am inclined to give him permission to go abroad. 5.The applicant is permitted to travel abroad from 12[th] May 2015 to 16[th] February, 2016. 6.The application stands disposed of. (JUDGE) nsk page 2 of 2