Appp v. Dy Comm Of Income Tax And Anr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 51 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 614 OF 2011 Pinakin Kantilal Patel...Applicant.VersusCy. Comm. Of Income Tax,Spl. Range, 20, Mumbai and Others...Respondents. Mr. Pawan Mali i/b Mr. Prakash Naik for the Applicant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No. 1.Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J.Date :February 12, 2013. P. C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The Applicant is an Architect by profession. He is seeking permission to travel abroad. Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that earlier orders of such liberty are not misused by the Applicant. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 did not dispute this statement. Taking into consideration nature of the offence alleged against the Applicant and the fact that this Court has admitted the main application filed under section 482 and has stayed further proceedings of the criminal case, the present application deserves to be granted. In that view of the matter, the Applicant is granted permission to travel abroad upto 31[st] June 2014. 2.Application stands disposed of in above terms. (RANJIT MORE, J.)