Archan Enterprises v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Archan Enterprises v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Archan Enterprises v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/489/2010 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 489 of 2010With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 490 of 2010
==========================================================
ARCHAN ENTERPRISES Versus
CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS NISHA OZA, ADVOCATE FOR M/S WADIAGHANDY AND CO(5679) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 10/03/2021
COMMON ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Ms. Nisha Oza, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in the two captioned Tax Appeals submits that she has instructions from her clients not to press the two Tax Appeals as the parallel proceedings have already attained finality.
In view of such statement being made, both the Tax Appeals are disposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on the substantial questions of law framed by this Court at the time of the admission of the two appeals.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
CHANDRESH
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.