Arihant Shivank Infra Projects Ltd v. Raghunath Prasad Jain
High Court
23 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Arihant Shivank Infra Projects Ltd v. Raghunath Prasad Jain
Date of order
23 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Arihant Shivank Infra Projects Ltd v. Raghunath Prasad Jain, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 162/2024
Arihant Shivank Infra Projects Ltd., Through Its Director Mr.Rishabh Goel Having Its Office At Second Floor, Class Of Pearl,Income Tax Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Raghunath Prasad Jain S/o Late Sh. Govind Ram Jain, AgedAbout 80 Years, Residing At A-104, Gujarwala Town, New Delhi-110009 And Plot No. 9, Devi Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan-302001
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitish Kumar Bagri, Ms. Shretma BagriFor Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSALOrder
23/08/2024
1.Counsel for applicant submits that the arbitrationproceedings have been culminated and arbitration award hasalready been passed on 23.07.2024, hence the presentapplication, seeking extension of period to conclude the arbitrationproceedings has rendered infructuous. Therefore, applicant doesnot want to press the present arbitration application.
2.In view of above, the present arbitration application isdismissed as not press.
3.All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue