Arjun Anil Salgaocar v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax & Ors. …
High Court
04 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Arjun Anil Salgaocar v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax & Ors. …
Date of order
04 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Arjun Anil Salgaocar v. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax & Ors. …, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.1107 OF 2018
Arjun Anil Salgaocar.
…... Petitioner.
Versus
Assistant Director of Income-Tax & ors. …... Respondents.
Mr. P. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwin D. Bhobe, Ms.
Carmita Mashelkar and Ms. K. Govekar, Advocates for the Petitioner.Ms.Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Respondents.
Coram : S.C. Gupte &
Nutan D. Sardessai, JJ. th July, 2019.
Date : 4
P.C. :-
After the matter is heard at some length, learned SeniorCounsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw thepetition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. It is made clear that the legal issue arising in the present writpetition, namely, whether or not, after search and seizure operationsand a notice issued under Section 153A of the Income-tax Act,1961(“Act”) in pursuance of such search and seizure operations,whilst the matter is pending before the Assessing Officer, theauthorities named under Section 131(1A) of the Act can exercisetheir powers provided for therein, has not been decided by us and iskept open.
Nutan D. Sardessai, J. S.C. Gupte, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue