Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Arthi Baliga v. Income Tax Officer, Non-...

Arthi Baliga v. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 3(1), Chennai Wanaparthy Block

High Court 01 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Arthi Baliga v. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 3(1), Chennai Wanaparthy Block
Date of order
01 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Arthi Baliga v. Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 3(1), Chennai Wanaparthy Block, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.04.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.7973 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.7958 & 7961 of 2022 Arthi Baliga ... Petitioner Vs 1.Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 3(1), Chennai Wanaparthy Block, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi Represented by Additional/Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Room No.401, 2[nd] Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi – 110 003. 3.M/s.Baliga Lighting Company (Since Dissolved) Represented by its erstwhile partner, Mr.Ramesh Baliga, No.63A, CP Ramaswamy Road, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. 4.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Circle 3(1), Chennai Wanaparthy Block, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamusto call for the records pertaining to the impugned noticeu/s.148dated31/03/2021havingDIN&NoticeNo.ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1032045976(1) for Asst. Year 2017-18issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same as it is againstlaw and direct the 4th respondent to shift the petitioner's shareof taxes, which was paid by the 3rd respondent firm (includingTDS), to the account of the petitioner on the file of the 1strespondent and such shifted tax payments should be considered astax payments made by the petitioner on 31/03/2017. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ravi For Respondents : Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar Junior Standing Counsel ORDER It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitionerthat the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition isdismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connectedmiscellaneous petitions are closed. Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Sgl To 1.Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 3(1), Chennai Wanaparthy Block, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi Represented by Additional/Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Room No.401, 2[nd] Floor, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi – 110 003. 3.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Non-Corporate Circle 3(1), Chennai Wanaparthy Block, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. +1cc to Mr.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.22504
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Get help with an income-tax notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan