Arulsundaram Nithyano v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Arulsundaram Nithyano v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Arulsundaram Nithyano v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
CMP NO. 1784 of 2025
Arulsundaram NithyaNo.11, Poondurai Road, Ragupathynaickenpalayam, Erode 638 002
Vs
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Central Circle 2, No. 63, Race Course Road, Income Tax Department, Coimbatore 641 018.
Appellant(s)
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s):
Mr.A S Sriraman
For Respondent(s):
Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, Sr Standing Counsel
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)
This Petition is filed to condone the delay of 86 days in filing the appeal in TC
Appeal SR No. 5471 of 2025.
2. This Court is fully convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in
support of the petition. The delay is explained to the satisfaction of this Court. The
learned counsel appearing for the respondent has not raised any serious objections to allow this petition.
3. In view of the above, the miscellaneous petition is ordered. The delay of 86
days in filing the appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the apeal and list the same before this Court, if otherwise in order.
(S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.) 04-02-2025
ak
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.