Case LawHigh Court › Arumugam Ganesan v. The Income Tax Offic...

Arumugam Ganesan v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1(3), Tirupur

High Court 10 Nov 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Arumugam Ganesan v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1(3), Tirupur
Date of order
10 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Arumugam Ganesan v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1(3), Tirupur, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In light of the endorsement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.6085 of 2020 &WMP.Nos.7151 & 7156 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.6085 of 2020 &WMP.Nos.7151 & 7156 of 2020 Arumugam Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1(3), Tirupur. ... Respondent Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue aWrit of certiorari, calling for the records on the files of the respondent in Ref.No.ITBA/AST/3/143(3)/2019-20/1023370548(1) dated 29.12.2019 and quash the same as being without jurisdiction, authority of law and contrary to the principles of natural justice. For Petitioner : Mr.R.SenniappanFor Respondent: Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel O R D E R Mr.R.Senniappan, learned counsel for the petitioner makes an endorsement of withdrawal referring to pursue the matter in statutory appeal. W.P.No.6085 of 2020 &WMP.Nos.7151 & 7156 of 2020 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. 2. This writ petition has been filed beyond the period of limitation but Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the petitioner pursuing statutory appeal. 3. Since the petitioner is stated to be suffering a serious medical ailment six weeks' time is granted to him to file an appeal. Appeal, if filed within a period of six weeks, shall be entertained by the appellate authority without reference to limitation but ensuring compliances with all other statutory conditions. 4. In light of the endorsement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 10.11.2022 skaIndex : Yes/NoSpeaking OrderNote: Registry is directed to return the original impugned order. To The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1(3), Tirupur. W.P.No.6085 of 2020 &WMP.Nos.7151 & 7156 of 2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan