Case LawHigh Court › Arvind Shah v. Principal Commissioner Of...

Arvind Shah v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, New Revenuebuilding, Statue Circle, Janpath, Jaipur

High Court 18 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Arvind Shah v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, New Revenuebuilding, Statue Circle, Janpath, Jaipur
Date of order
18 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Arvind Shah v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, New Revenuebuilding, Statue Circle, Janpath, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18692/2019 Arvind Shah S/o Lt. Shri Bhag Chand Shah, Aged About 60Years, R/o 2654, Ghee Walon Ka Rasta, Johri Bazar, Jaipur -302003. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, New RevenueBuilding, Statue Circle, Janpath, Jaipur - 302005Building, Statue Circle, Janpath, Jaipur - 302005 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2 (1), New C.r. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur - 302005.Statue Circle, Jaipur - 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Lipi Garg, Adv. for Mr.Archit Bohra,Adv. Adv. For Respondent(s): Mr.Siddharth Bapna, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 18/03/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatapplication made under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme has beenaccepted and no cause of action survives for pursuing thispetition. The petition is dismissed as infructuous. (BHUWAN GOYAL), J (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J HS/32
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan