Ashaben Ramesh Valrani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax & 1
High Court
12 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Ashaben Ramesh Valrani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax & 1
Date of order
12 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ashaben Ramesh Valrani v. Commissioner Of Income Tax & 1, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ ASHABEN RAMESH VALRANI....Petitioner(s) Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & 1....Respondent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR KH KAJ...
Decision: With above directions petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
C/SCA/5134/2005 JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5134 of 2005
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
and
HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
================================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?
5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
================================================================
ASHABEN RAMESH VALRANI....Petitioner(s)
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & 1....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR KH KAJI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MR MANISH K KAJI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
and
HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
Date : 12/02/2014
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1. This petition was filed with two separate prayers. One was challenging an order under section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act passed by respondent no.1 on 11.2.2005 transferring the assessment proceedings of the petitioner from Bhavnagar to Ahmedabad. The second prayer pertains to validity of notice under section 153C of the Act.challenging an order under section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act passed by respondent no.1 on 11.2.2005 transferring the assessment proceedings of the petitioner from Bhavnagar to Ahmedabad. The second prayer pertains to validity of notice under section 153C of the Act.
2. By an interim order dated 20.4.2005, this Court restrained the respondents from passing assessment order for the assessment year 1999-2000 to 2004-2005 but permitted respondent no.2 to carry out necessary investigation, ensuring that such investigation shall take place at Bhavnagar. the respondents from passing assessment order for the assessment year 1999-2000 to 2004-2005 but permitted respondent no.2 to carry out necessary investigation, ensuring that such investigation shall take place at Bhavnagar.
3. Learned advocates for parties have brought to our notice certain developments which took place after the said order dated 20.4.2005 was passed. Ms. Bhatt pointed out that the entire investigation at Bhavnagar has been completed but the final order has not been passed due to interim injunction. Learned counsel Shri Kazi for the petitioner pointed out that in view of a recent decision of Supreme Court in case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Vijaybhai N. Chandrani reported in (2013) 357 ITR 713(SC), the petitioner’s challenge to the notice under section 153C of the Act before the High Court would not certain developments which took place after the said order dated 20.4.2005 was passed. Ms. Bhatt pointed out that the entire investigation at Bhavnagar has been completed but the final order has not been passed due to interim injunction. Learned counsel Shri Kazi for the petitioner pointed out that in view of a recent decision of Supreme Court in case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Vijaybhai N. Chandrani reported in (2013) 357 ITR 713(SC), the petitioner’s challenge to the notice under section 153C of the Act before the High Court would not
survive. He would not press such prayer keeping the right of the petitioner open to raise all contentions before the Assessing Officer.
4. In view of such developments, this petition is disposed of with a liberty to respondents to pass final order of assessment for the said assessment years, however, before which the petitioner would be given an opportunity of raising all contentions and objections including with respect to proceeding under section 153C of the Act.with a liberty to respondents to pass final order of assessment for the said assessment years, however, before which the petitioner would be given an opportunity of raising all contentions and objections including with respect to proceeding under section 153C of the Act.
5. With above directions petition is disposed of.
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
raghu
(MS SONIA GOKANI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.