Case LawHigh Court › Ashika Commercial Private Limited v. The...

Ashika Commercial Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3/3 Kolkata And Ors

High Court 09 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ashika Commercial Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3/3 Kolkata And Ors
Date of order
09 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ashika Commercial Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3/3 Kolkata And Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, this writ petition being WPO 859 of 2024 is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

OD-6 WPO/859/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE ASHIKA COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3/3 KOLKATA AND ORS. BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 9[th] January, 2025 Appearance :Mr. Abhratosh Majumdar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. For petitioner. Mrs. Smita Das De, Adv. For respondents. The Court: Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order under Section 148 A (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 both dated 24[th] April, 2024, relating to the assessment year 2017-18, inter alia, on the ground that the impugned proceedings including the impugned order is not sustainable in law in view of the order of the National Company Law Tribunal through the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in the case of the petitioner itself, dated 12[th] August, 2020, by which the aforesaid Tribunal has held that any re-assessment, revision or other proceedings under the provisions of applicable laws relating to taxes would be deemed to be barred and admittedly such order of the Tribunal was passed before passing of the impugned order and notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. In view of the aforesaid factual and legal position, the impugned proceedings including the aforesaid impugned order dated 24[th] April, 2024 and subsequent proceedings is not sustainable in law and is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, this writ petition being WPO 859 of 2024 is disposed of. (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan