Case LawHigh Court › Ashok Contruction Co v. Commissioner Of...

Ashok Contruction Co v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Aug 2000 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Ashok Contruction Co v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Aug 2000
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ashok Contruction Co v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2000) decided the matter.

Issue: In that reference, the High Court, considering an identical question namely, "whether the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was not entitled to depreciation @ 30% on dumpers?", answered the question in the negative, against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 397 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1�Yes 2 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- ASHOK CONTRUCTION CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH J SHAH for MR JP SHAH for Petitioner MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 10/08/2000 �The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'B', has referred the following question for the opinion this Court under sec. 256(1)of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : "Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee was not entitled to the depreciation @ 30% on dumpers?" 2.�When this Reference is called out for hearing, we are told by the learned counsel that the question is squarely covered by a decision of this court in Shiv Construction Co. v. CIT reported in 165 ITR 160. In that reference, the High Court, considering an identical question namely, "whether the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was not entitled to depreciation @ 30% on dumpers?", answered the question in the negative, against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. 3.�Following the said decision, the question referred to us is answered in the negative, against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. 4.�The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. _____ ����(R.K. Abichandani, J.) ����(A.R. Dave, J.) (hn)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan