In Ashok Kakkar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Through: None, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~51
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1018/2010
ASHOK KAKKAR
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Madhur Aggarwal and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advocates.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through: None.
..... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 05.09.2018
It is stated by the learned counsel for the assessee/appellant that he has instructions not to press the appeal; this is because the question of law framed pertained to two issues that were subjected to remand. After remission the assessee’s claims were upheld and relief was granted to him.
In these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
SEPTEMBER 05, 2018/nn
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue