Case LawHigh Court › Ashok Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

High Court 27 Jun 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar
Date of order
27 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ashok Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.844 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA S/O LATE SHITAL SAH Resident of GayatriKunj, Income Tax Colony, P.S.- Agamkuan, District- Patna (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HOME(POLICE), GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. BIHAR(POLICE), GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. BIHAR 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. BIHAR 3.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. BIHAR 4.THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA BIHAR 5.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PATNA CITY (PATNA). BIHAR 6.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, PATNA CITY (PATNA).BIHARBIHAR 7.THE S.H.O. AGAMKUAN POLICE STATION, PATNA. BIHAR 8.VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA S/O LATE SHITAL SAH Resident of Income TaxColony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.- Agamkuan,Dist-Patna.Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.- Agamkuan,Dist-Patna. 9.SANJEEV KUMAR @ SONI @ SONU KUMAR S/O VIJAY KUMARGUPTA Resident of Income Tax Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.- Agamkuan,Dist- Patna.GUPTA Resident of Income Tax Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.- Agamkuan,Dist- Patna. 10.RAJEEV KUMAR @ MONU KUMAR S/O VIJAY KUMAR GUPTAResident of Income Tax Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.- Agamkuan, Dist-Patna.Resident of Income Tax Colony, Bhoot Nath Road, P.S.- Agamkuan, Dist-Patna. 227-06-2024 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/sFor the Respondent/s : Mr. Tejendra Sinha: Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMARORAL ORDER Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner and the respondent no. 8 are brothers and they have some property dispute with regard to the use of passage. 3. This application is dismissed with liberty to the Vikas/- UT petitioner to approach the District Court concerned forrederessal of his grievances. (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan