Case Law › High Court › Ashok Panchand Mehta (Huf) … v. Leaened...

Ashok Panchand Mehta (Huf) … v. Leaened Counsel Foe The Appellantr On Insteuctionsr

High Court 22 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Jun 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ashok Panchand Mehta (Huf) … v. Leaened Counsel Foe The Appellantr On Insteuctionsr, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 6-ITXA 193-19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.193 OF 2019 Ashok Panchand Mehta (HUF)… AppellantVs. Income Tax Offceer Waed 22(1)(2)r Mumbai… Respondent------- Ms. Ruchi Rathod i/by Ratan Samal foe the Appellant.Me. Sham Walve foe the Respondent. ------- CORAM :SUNIL P. DESHMUKH &ABHAY AHUJAr JJ. DATE :22ND JUNE 2021 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) P.C.: 1.Leaened counsel foe the Appellantr on insteuctionsr seeks leave to withdeaw the Appeal. Me. Walver leaened counsel foeRespondent has no paeticulae objection. Leave geanted. Income TaxAppeal is disposed of as withdeawn. 2. Refund of Couet-fees as pee eules. (ABHAY AHUJAr J.) (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH r J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.