Ashutosh Krishnaprasad Das v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Iv), Nagpur And Others
High Court
23 Oct 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Ashutosh Krishnaprasad Das v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Iv), Nagpur And Others
Date of order
23 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ashutosh Krishnaprasad Das v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Iv), Nagpur And Others, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Income Tax Appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPURINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.58/2006
Ashutosh Krishnaprasad Das, Proprietor M/s. Reena Enterprises, Nagpur...Versus...Commissioner of Income Tax (IV), Nagpur and others
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's ordersor directions and Registrar's orders.
(Shri P.C. Madkholkar, Adv. for appellant) (Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for respondents)
CORAM:- Smt. Vasanti A. Naik & A.B. Chaudhari, JJ.DATED :- 23.10.2007
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.We have perused the order passed by the Income Tax Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur on 16.12.2005. Since the Tribunal has remanded the matter to the C.I.T. (Appeals) for adjudicating the same afresh after affording an opportunity to the parties of being heard, we feel that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal.
The learned Counsel for the appellant apprehends that the appellant would not be permitted to agitate the question of denial of opportunity before the Assessing Officer to
2
produce the material facts on record. The apprehension does not appear to be well founded. The appellant has already raised the aforesaid ground in the appeal filed by the appellant before the C.I.T. (Appeals). The appellant is, therefore, at liberty to agitate the same before the C.I.T.(Appeals).
The Income Tax Appeal is, therefore,
dismissed with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
ssw
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.