Ashwani Kumar v. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Income Tax Officer And Others
High Court
14 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ashwani Kumar v. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Income Tax Officer And Others
Date of order
14 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ashwani Kumar v. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Income Tax Officer And Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHCWP-18230-2022 (O&M)Date of Decision: 14.11.2022
Ashwani Kumar
Versus
—____- Petitioner
Pawan Kumar Sharma, Income Tax Officer and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Dr. Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA J.(Oral)
Challenge in the instant petition is to the assessment order dated25.03.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Assessing Authority pertaining toassessment year 2013-14. Further challenge is to the consequential noticedated 30.03.2021 (Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No.1 under Section148 of the Income Tax Act 1961|
Having heard counsel for the petitioner at length and havingperused the pleadings on record, we are of the considered view that nointerference at this stage is warranted.
Concededly, petitioner has statutory remedy of appeal against theassessment order dated 25.03.2022 (Annexure P-7) which he ought to avail.In view of the above, writ petition is disposed of,In view of the above, writ petition is disposed of,
Suffice it to observe that it would be open for the petitioner toavail of his statutory remedy of appeal and by raising all such grounds as maybe available in accordance with law.
Disposed of.
(TEJINDR SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE
14.11.2022shweta
(DEEPAK GUPTA)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.