Ashwin C. Negandhi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Ors
High Court
07 May 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Ashwin C. Negandhi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Ors
Date of order
07 May 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ashwin C. Negandhi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Ors, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2142 OF 2012
Ashwin C. Negandhi
Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) and Ors.
.Respondents
Mr. Surel Shah for the petitioner.
Mr. P.C. Chottaray for respondent no. 1.
Mr. P.R. Yadav i/by M/s. Dixit and Yadav Company for respondent nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRUCHUD &R.D. DHANUKA,JJ.DATED : MAY 07, 2012
P.C.
The petitioner has sought a direction against the first respondent to
issue notices to respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 calling upon them to disclose the status of certain amounts deducted as TDS. The learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 has placed on record a copy of the notice dated 15 March, 2012 issued by the Assessing Officer to the 4th respondent. Pursuant to that notice, it appears that, on 3 April, 2012 an amount of Rs. 2,01,970/-- has been deposited with the treasury. In any event, the
first respondent would be at liberty to take necessary steps in accordance with the law. We do not find any reason to entertain this petition any further having regard to the aforesaid background. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.
R.D. DHANUKA,J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.