Asn v. M/S. Ankur Diamonds
High Court
10 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Asn v. M/S. Ankur Diamonds
Date of order
10 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Asn v. M/S. Ankur Diamonds, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.277 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2611 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Ankur Diamonds...Respondent.
Mrs.Anuradha Mane with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for theAppellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009.
PC :
1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 1205 days
delay in filing the main appeal.
2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on28.4.2005 but the appeal came to be filed more thanthree years later, on 5.8.2008. The delay causedbetween the period 28.4.2005 and 5.8.2008 has not beenproperly explained. In our view, therefore, the causeshown does not amount to sufficient cause. Notice of
motion is therefore, dismissed. Consequently appeal
dismissed. Certified copy expedited.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue