Asn v. This Is A Notice Of Motion For Condoning 1702 Days
High Court
10 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Asn v. This Is A Notice Of Motion For Condoning 1702 Days
Date of order
10 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Asn v. This Is A Notice Of Motion For Condoning 1702 Days, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.276 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2543 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.Smt. Smita A. Mehta...Respondent.
Mrs.Anuradha Mane with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for theAppellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009.
PC :
1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 1702 days
delay in filing the main appeal.
2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on7.1.2004 but the appeal came to be filed more than fouryears and seven months later, on 2.8.2008. The delaycaused between the period 7.1.2004 and 2.8.2008 has notbeen properly explained. In our view, therefore, thecause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Notice
of motion is therefore, dismissed. Consequently appeal
dismissed. Certified copy expedited.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue