Assessing Officer v. Syed Jamilur Rehman, Doomri Kothi, Exhibition Road, Patna
High Court
02 Dec 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Assessing Officer v. Syed Jamilur Rehman, Doomri Kothi, Exhibition Road, Patna
Date of order
02 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Assessing Officer v. Syed Jamilur Rehman, Doomri Kothi, Exhibition Road, Patna, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.310 of 2007
======================================================
1.Commissioner of Income Tax –II, Patna
2.Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6, Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/ Appellants Versus
Syed Jamilur Rehman, Doomri Kothi, Exhibition Road, Patna
.... .... Assessee/Respondent
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rishiraj Sinha, Sr.S.C. (Income Tax) with Ms. Archana Prasad, Jr.S.C.(Income Tax) For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan & Mr.Abhi Sarkar, Advocates.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR
DATTA
and
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
6 02-12-2014 Mr. Rishiraj Sinha, learned Sr.Standing Counsel for the
Income Tax Department, submits that the present appeal has
become non-maintainable in view of the order dated 19.4.2012 of this court passed in M.A. No. 251 of 2010.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not
maintainable.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
spal/-
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.