Assessment), Special Range-1, Dehradun v. M/S Dixilyn Field Int. Drilling. Com. Houston, U.s.a
High Court
15 Dec 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Assessment), Special Range-1, Dehradun v. M/S Dixilyn Field Int. Drilling. Com. Houston, U.s.a
Date of order
15 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Assessment), Special Range-1, Dehradun v. M/S Dixilyn Field Int. Drilling. Com. Houston, U.s.a, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
RESERVED JUDGMENT
COURT NO.2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.552 OF 2001
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun
2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
(Assessment), Special Range-1, Dehradun
………… Appellants
Versus
M/s Dixilyn Field Int. Drilling. Com. Houston, U.S.A.
……………. Respondent
Sri S.K. Posti, Advocate, learned counsel for the appellants Sri J.P. Joshi, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent
Dated: December 15, 2005
Coram: Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.
The facts and circumstances of the case are identical to the facts in Income Tax Appeal No.115 of 2001, Commissioner of Income tax, Meerut and another Vs. M/s ONGC as agent of M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. Tel Bhawan, Dehradun, which is being decided today. The substantial question which arises for our consideration has been answered in favour of the Revenue.
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The question is answered in favour of the Revenue.
(J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (P.C. Verma, J.)
Rajeev Dang
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.