Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Officer- 1(1) Bhilai, Durg, C.g v. Jayshree Paddy Processor Pvt. Ltd. 32/32, Bunglow Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh
High Court
25 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Officer- 1(1) Bhilai, Durg, C.g v. Jayshree Paddy Processor Pvt. Ltd. 32/32, Bunglow Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
25 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Officer- 1(1) Bhilai, Durg, C.g v. Jayshree Paddy Processor Pvt. Ltd. 32/32, Bunglow Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byAJAY KUMARDWIVEDIDate:2025.06.2712:01:51+0530
2025:CGHC:27936-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 596 of 2025
Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Officer- 1(1) Bhilai, Durg, C.G.
... Applicant.
versus
Jayshree Paddy Processor Pvt. Ltd. 32/32, Bunglow Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh, 490006, Pan- Aabcj494n
... Respondent.For Applicant :Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate.For Respondent:None.
Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal &Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ
Order on Board
(26/06/2025)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
1. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of TAX Case No.22/2025, which was dismissed for non-compliance of this Court's peremptory order dated 02.04.2025. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of TAX Case No.22/2025, which was dismissed for non-compliance of this Court's peremptory order dated 02.04.2025.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. TAX Case No.22/2025 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. TAX Case No.22/2025 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law.
3.allowed. Accordingly, the MCC is Accordingly, the MCC is
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Judge
Judge
Ajay
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.