Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh v. Shri B.l. Agrawal
High Court
15 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh v. Shri B.l. Agrawal
Date of order
15 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh v. Shri B.l. Agrawal, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Misc. Civil Case No.489 of 2018
NAFR
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
Shri B.L. Agrawal R/o Mayur Bhawan Near Radha Krishna Saw Mill, New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.Saw Mill, New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicant: Shri B. Gopakumar, Asst. Solicitor GeneralFor the Respondent : None
DB:Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra &Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna SharmaOrder On Board
Per Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
15.02.2019.
Heard on IA No.01/2018 for condonation of delay in filing the
MCC.
2.On due consideration, the application is allowed and the delay
of 12 days in filing the instant MCC is hereby condoned.
3.Also heard on instant MCC filed for restoration of Tax Case
No.107 of 2017, which was dismissed on peremptory order dated 04.4.2017.
4.For the reasons mentioned in the instant MCC, the same is
allowed and Tax Case No. 104 of 2017 is restored to its original number.
Sd/- Sd/- Judge Judge(Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Ram Prasanna Sharma)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.