Case LawHigh Court › Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 R...

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh v. Shri B.l. Agrawal

High Court 15 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh v. Shri B.l. Agrawal
Date of order
15 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh v. Shri B.l. Agrawal, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Civil Case No.489 of 2018 NAFR Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant Versus Shri B.L. Agrawal R/o Mayur Bhawan Near Radha Krishna Saw Mill, New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.Saw Mill, New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For the Applicant: Shri B. Gopakumar, Asst. Solicitor GeneralFor the Respondent : None DB:Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra &Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna SharmaOrder On Board Per Prashant Kumar Mishra, J 15.02.2019. Heard on IA No.01/2018 for condonation of delay in filing the MCC. 2.On due consideration, the application is allowed and the delay of 12 days in filing the instant MCC is hereby condoned. 3.Also heard on instant MCC filed for restoration of Tax Case No.107 of 2017, which was dismissed on peremptory order dated 04.4.2017. 4.For the reasons mentioned in the instant MCC, the same is allowed and Tax Case No. 104 of 2017 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Sd/- Judge Judge(Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Ram Prasanna Sharma)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan