Case Law › High Court › Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1...

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Raipur v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai E-Bench, Mumbai

High Court 28 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

28 Mar 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Raipur v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai E-Bench, Mumbai, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 6972 of 2009 1. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur 2. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Raipur ---- Petitioners Versus 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai E-Bench, Mumbai 2. M/s Chhattisgarh Electricity Company Limited, (Now Known As M/s Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd. Siltara, Raipur Minerals Ltd. Siltara, Raipur 3. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal Nagpur Bench, Nagpur ---- Respondents 28/03/2016Ms. Noushina Afrin Ali, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Neelabh Dubey, counsel for the respondent No. 2.Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-(Goutam Bhaduri)JudgeKamde

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.