Case LawHigh Court › Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ce...

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Assessee

High Court 30 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Assessee
Date of order
30 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Assessee, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.545 of 2007 ====================================================== 1.Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna. 2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna. .... .... Assessing Officer/Appellants Versus Smt. Usha Boobna, wife of Shri Arun Kumar Bagdulhan, Hajipur, Vaishali. .... .... Assessee/ Respondent ====================================================== Appearance: For the Appellants : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Advocate Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : --- ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 30-10-2013 Heard Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, learned Counsel for the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna. He concedes that the tax effect in the matter at issue is less than Rs. four lakhs. In view of the monetary limits imposed by the Government of India under Section 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, this Appeal is not maintainable. Appeal isaccordinglydisposedof. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Vikash Jain, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan