Case LawHigh Court › Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ce...

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Sudarshan Kumar Bansal, Abhishek Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna

High Court 11 Apr 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Sudarshan Kumar Bansal, Abhishek Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna
Date of order
11 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Sudarshan Kumar Bansal, Abhishek Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is therefore, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.19 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna .... .... Appellant/s Versus Shri Sudarshan Kumar Bansal, Abhishek Plaza, Exhibition Road, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellant/s : ` Mr.Harshwardhan Prasad Mr. Archana Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D.Sanjay, Mr.Harshwardhan Prasad Mr. Archana Sinha Mr. S.D.Sanjay, Mr.Gautam Kejriwal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAINORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH) 5 11-04-2012 Heard the parties. 2. The main grievance raised on behalf of the appellant is that the remand report has not been considered by the learned Tribunal in the order under appeal. However, it is apparent from the order of the Tribunal that it has considered the appellate order passed by the learned C.I.T. (Appeals) and has agreed with that order. A perusal of appellate order passed by the C.I.T. (Appeals) discloses that the remand report has been considered in detail at various places in respect of relevant heads of deletion. The issues are concluded by finding of fact and no substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court. 3. This appeal is therefore, dismissed. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) (Vikash Jain, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan